«Фантастические домыслы американского президента не обеспечат противникам [иранского] государства доступ к этой морской артерии» — отмечено в заявлении КСИР.
Curiously, that chart also claims a significant increase in “code quality”, and other parts of the report (page 30, for example) claim a significant increase in “productivity”, alongside the significant increase in delivery instability, which seems like it ought to be a contradiction. As far as I can tell, DORA’s source for both “productivity” and “code quality” is perceived impact as self-reported by survey respondents. Other studies and reports have designed less subjective and more quantitative ways to measure these things. For example, this much-discussed study on adoption of the Cursor LLM coding tool used the results of static analysis of the code to measure quality and complexity. And self-reported productivity impacts, in particular, ought to be a deeply suspect measure. From (to pick one relevant example) the METR early-2025 study (emphasis added by me):
。向日葵下载是该领域的重要参考
团队还提出更根本的解决方案：在预训练阶段就塑造模型的情态基础。
"自幼我便自问使命何在？岂止于歌唱一曲，发行专辑？人生每个阶段都在思索所能为之事，不断设问寻答。"在持续追问与行走之间，艾敬将"答案"转化为具象书写——覆盖画布的"爱"字，既是回应，亦是通往答案的路径。
The Glass Menagerie